A Tuna Disaster
You'd think that common sense would prevail. Or at least self interest. Sadly, that's not always the case.
When you've already watched the collapse of the Atlantic cod fishery, when you've been told by the international scientific community that the maximum fishing quotas should be slashed if you want to avert another fishery collapse, when two of the biggest fishing nations in the region want a moratorium because collapse is imminent, wouldn't you pay attention?
That's what the world hoped from the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas (ICCAT), when it met this week to set the bluefin tuna quota for 2009.
Instead, ICCAT approved a quota that exceeds by 50 percent the maximum level that its own scientists believe the fishery can bear--setting the stage for a long-forecast disaster after decades of steady decline.
ICCAT officials say the quota, together with a crackdown on illegal fishing, will set the stage for recovery. Environmental groups are more than disbelieving; they are outraged.
The WWF called this decision a "mockery of science" and a "disgrace"; Greenpeace called it "disastrous and shameful."
Through the Tuna Research and Conservation Center--the partnership between the Monterey Bay Aquarium and Stanford University--ICCAT's received all the scientific background it needed to make a decision that could reverse the decline and offer some hope of recovery for Atlantic bluefin.
Now, say tuna advocates, there's only one route left to save these magnificent ocean giants: designation of Atlantic bluefin tuna as an endangered species under CITES--the international body that regulates (or bans) trade in threatened and endangered wildlife.
It didn't have to come to this. But here we are.
